UK Healthcare Property: Secure Yields Amid PE Investment Surge

High net worth individuals are increasingly investing in UK healthcare property due to its stability and attractive returns amid economic uncertainty. Private equity firms have significantly invested in this sector, particularly in single-specialty hospitals, reshaping market dynamics. Healthcare properties offer long-term leases and essential services, providing consistent demand. Investors are advised to consider Single Asset Funds for greater transparency and reduced risk compared to private equity models. Regional diversification and tax-efficient structures are also crucial for optimising investment strategies.
Two healthcare professionals discussing patient care in a modern hospital corridor with large windows and bright lighting.

UK Healthcare Property: Secure Yields Amid PE Investment Surge

As economic uncertainty continues to challenge traditional investment strategies, high net worth individuals are increasingly seeking asset classes that offer both stability and attractive returns. Healthcare property has emerged as a compelling option, particularly as private equity firms pour unprecedented capital into the sector. This growing institutional interest validates the sector’s potential while simultaneously creating a more competitive landscape for individual investors to navigate.

The healthcare property sector’s appeal lies in its unique combination of defensive characteristics and income generation potential. Unlike traditional commercial real estate, healthcare facilities benefit from long-term leases, often with inflation-linked rent reviews, and tenants providing essential services that remain in demand regardless of economic conditions. These fundamentals have attracted significant private capital, reshaping the market dynamics for sophisticated investors.

The Rapid Expansion of Private Equity in Healthcare Real Estate

Private equity firms have identified healthcare facilities as prime investment targets, directing substantial capital toward single-specialty hospitals and clinics. According to recent data, private equity investments in single specialty healthcare have totalled $3.7 billion in the last decade, accounting for over 35% of total hospital investments [1]. This capital has been predominantly directed toward established specialties including IVF, eyecare, mother & childcare, dialysis, and oncology—segments that offer scalable business models, lower capital requirements, and strong returns on investment.

The UK market has witnessed particularly notable activity, with the £1.6 billion buyout offer for Assura, a major owner of GP surgeries, by private infrastructure investors KKR and Stonepeak Partners representing a 32% premium over Assura’s recent closing price [2]. This transaction highlights the sector’s attractiveness to private equity and demonstrates the premium valuations institutional investors are willing to pay for quality healthcare assets.

This substantial influx of institutional capital demonstrates growing confidence in healthcare real estate as a profitable asset class. For high net worth investors, this trend serves as both validation of the sector’s potential and a signal of increasing competition for prime assets. Understanding which healthcare property segments are attracting the most institutional interest can provide valuable guidance when constructing a portfolio in this sector.

“The healthcare sector is characterized by strong operational performance, rising demand, and attractive lease features, making it appealing to investors even in challenging economic conditions.” – CBRE UK Real Estate Market Outlook 2024 [3]

Comparing Investment Structures: Single Asset Funds vs. Private Equity Models

As private capital flows into healthcare properties, high net worth individuals must carefully evaluate different investment structures. The private equity approach typically involves leveraged buyouts that can introduce significant risk. Research indicates that healthcare entities acquired through private equity leveraged buyouts are nearly 10 times more likely to go bankrupt, as these firms leave the acquired healthcare entity with the debt used for its purchase [4].

This concerning statistic highlights a fundamental risk in private equity’s approach to healthcare property investment. The high debt burden placed on acquired facilities can compromise long-term financial stability, potentially undermining the very security that makes healthcare properties attractive to HNWIs seeking stable income-generating assets. Additionally, private equity firms typically aim to generate high returns within a relatively short timeframe (three to seven years), often implementing significant cost-cutting measures and management changes that prioritise revenue-generating services over long-term sustainability.

In contrast, more transparent investment structures such as Single Asset Funds (SAFs) offer investors direct ownership in specific healthcare properties without the excessive leverage often employed by private equity firms. These structures typically prioritise stable, long-term income generation rather than aggressive short-term value extraction. SAFs provide investors with greater transparency regarding the specific asset being acquired, detailed due diligence information, and more direct control over investment decisions—attributes particularly valued by high net worth individuals seeking to preserve wealth while generating reliable income.

The advantages of SAFs become particularly evident when examining their structural differences from private equity models:

  • Transparency: SAFs provide complete visibility into the specific property being acquired, its tenant profile, lease terms, and financial projections, eliminating the ‘blind pool’ risk associated with many private equity funds.
  • Control: Investors in SAFs typically have greater influence over key decisions regarding the property, including acquisition terms, management approach, and exit strategy.
  • Reduced Leverage: Unlike many private equity structures that employ high levels of debt to enhance returns, SAFs generally utilize more conservative financing approaches, reducing financial risk.
  • Alignment of Interests: SAF managers typically co-invest alongside other investors and earn performance fees based on actual returns delivered, creating stronger alignment with investors compared to private equity’s traditional fee structure.

"Healthcare real estate is characterized by stable demand, long-term leases, and resilience during economic downturns, making it an attractive investment option." - HBRE

Healthcare Property Resilience Amid Economic Uncertainty

With declining confidence among high net worth individuals in the broader UK economy, healthcare properties offer a compelling alternative investment case. Recent data shows confidence among HNWIs in the UK economy has plummeted to a record low, with only 48% expressing faith, down from 84% six months ago [5]. This dramatic decline in economic confidence creates a pressing need for investment alternatives that can weather economic uncertainty.

Healthcare properties, particularly those with NHS-backed tenants or essential services, can provide the stability and predictable income streams that wealthy investors are increasingly prioritising over growth potential in the current climate. The defensive characteristics of healthcare properties stem from several factors: the essential nature of healthcare services ensures consistent demand regardless of economic conditions; long-term leases (often 15-25 years) provide income visibility; and many healthcare tenants benefit from direct or indirect government funding, reducing counterparty risk compared to purely commercial tenants.

According to CBRE’s UK Real Estate Market Outlook 2024, the healthcare sector demonstrates strong operational performance with rising demand and attractive lease features, making it appealing to investors even in challenging economic conditions [3]. This resilience is particularly evident when comparing healthcare properties to other commercial real estate sectors during periods of economic volatility.

When examining yield stability, healthcare properties often provide more stable and attractive yields compared to general commercial real estate. This stability is largely due to long-term leases, often backed by government funding, and the essential nature of healthcare services, which ensures consistent demand. Healthcare properties typically offer yields between 4-6%, compared to prime office space at 3.5-5%, retail at 5-8% (with significant volatility), and industrial at 3.5-5.5%.

Regional Diversification Strategies in UK Healthcare Property

As regional property markets across the UK show varying growth trajectories, high net worth investors can optimise their healthcare property portfolios through strategic geographic diversification. Regional cities are presenting new opportunities for healthcare property investments, driven by regeneration initiatives and demographic shifts. Manchester’s £10 billion masterplan is set to transform the city, potentially increasing demand for healthcare facilities [6].

This regional diversification trend presents opportunities for healthcare property investors to identify emerging hotspots where healthcare facilities may benefit from broader economic development. Cities undergoing major regeneration often see increased population density, rising incomes, and greater healthcare needs—all factors that can enhance the performance of healthcare property investments in these locations.

By identifying these emerging regional opportunities before institutional capital drives up valuations, investors can potentially secure higher yields while maintaining the defensive characteristics that make healthcare property attractive. The importance of regional diversification is particularly evident when examining rental growth patterns across the UK, which vary significantly by region and highlight the importance of a geographically diversified approach to healthcare property investment.

Recent market activity further supports the case for regional diversification. According to Savills, debt capital for the UK property market is now coming from lenders in 47 countries, a record number [7]. This diverse capital flow creates opportunities for healthcare property investors to access financing for regional acquisitions, potentially on more favorable terms than in previous years.

Tax Considerations for Healthcare Property Investments

Recent changes to UK tax policies create important considerations for high net worth individuals structuring their healthcare property investments. The UK government has ended the ‘non-dom’ tax status, effective April 2025, which is expected to raise £2.6 to £3.4 billion annually [8]. This major tax policy shift directly impacts how HNWIs, particularly those with international ties, structure their UK investments.

For healthcare property investments, this change may influence decisions about direct ownership versus fund structures, potentially increasing the appeal of tax-efficient vehicles that can optimise returns while maintaining compliance with the new tax landscape. The elimination of non-dom status means that foreign residents in the UK will now pay taxes on their worldwide income and gains, not just on UK-earned or repatriated income as previously allowed.

The practical implications of these tax changes for healthcare property investors include:

  • Increased importance of tax-efficient structures: With the elimination of non-dom status, structures that provide tax efficiency become more valuable. REITs, Limited Partnerships, and Property Authorised Investment Funds (PAIFs) may offer advantages by allowing for income to be taxed at the investor level rather than within the investment vehicle.
  • Reassessment of direct ownership: HNWIs who previously held healthcare properties directly may need to reassess this approach, potentially transitioning to structured vehicles that offer greater tax efficiency.
  • Strategic location selection: The tax changes may influence decisions about where to invest within the UK, with some regions offering more favourable local tax environments or incentives for healthcare property development.
  • Timing of acquisitions and disposals: With changing tax regimes, the timing of property transactions becomes increasingly important for tax planning purposes, potentially influencing investment horizons and exit strategies.

Additionally, the stable, long-term income streams generated by healthcare properties can help offset potential increases in tax burden through predictable cash flows, making them comparatively advantageous versus more volatile asset classes in the new tax environment.

Two professionals discussing documents in a modern conference room with large windows and greenery. Business meeting ambiance.

"Real estate cannot be lost or stolen, nor can it be carried away. Purchased with common sense, paid for in full, and managed with reasonable care, it is about the safest investment in the world." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

Navigating the Competitive Landscape Between Private Equity and Individual Investors

As private equity firms aggressively target healthcare facilities, high net worth individuals must develop strategic approaches to compete effectively. The intensifying competition requires sophisticated investors to identify opportunities that may be overlooked by institutional capital or to position themselves advantageously in competitive situations.

For high net worth investors seeking to navigate this competitive environment, several strategies can prove effective:

  • Focus on value-add opportunities: Many healthcare facilities require modernisation or expansion to meet current standards. Individual investors can often move more quickly than institutional capital to secure these opportunities and implement improvements.
  • Target regional markets: While private equity often focuses on major metropolitan areas, significant opportunities exist in regional markets where demographic trends and regeneration initiatives create demand for healthcare services.
  • Form investment consortiums: Individual investors can pool resources to increase their purchasing power and compete more effectively with private equity for larger, institutional-grade healthcare properties.
  • Leverage local market knowledge: High net worth individuals often have deep connections and knowledge in specific regions, providing an advantage over institutional investors when identifying off-market opportunities.
  • Emphasise long-term partnership: Unlike private equity’s typical short-term investment horizon, individual investors can position themselves as long-term partners to healthcare operators, which can be particularly appealing to healthcare providers seeking stable ownership structures.

The growing interest among high-net-worth investors in alternative investments, including healthcare property, is part of a broader trend driving financial institutions to expand their services for ultra-high-net-worth individuals, creating new opportunities for accessing healthcare property investments through specialised platforms and advisory services.

Conclusion

The UK healthcare property sector presents a compelling investment case for high net worth individuals seeking secure yields amid economic uncertainty. While private equity’s growing presence creates competition, it also validates the sector’s potential and creates opportunities for sophisticated investors who can navigate the market strategically.

By understanding the fundamental differences between private equity’s leveraged approach and more sustainable investment structures, focusing on regional diversification opportunities, optimising tax efficiency, and leveraging the sector’s defensive characteristics, high net worth investors can potentially secure attractive risk-adjusted returns from healthcare property investments.

For those considering healthcare property investments, several practical steps can enhance success:

  • Consider investment structures that provide direct asset ownership without excessive leverage
  • Explore regional opportunities in areas with strong demographic growth and infrastructure improvements
  • Evaluate tax-efficient ownership structures in light of recent policy changes
  • Focus on healthcare subsectors with essential service provision and long-term leases
  • Seek specialist advisors with healthcare sector expertise and access to off-market opportunities
  • Assess value-add opportunities in undersupplied markets where refurbishment can enhance returns

As economic uncertainty persists and traditional investment classes face volatility, healthcare property’s combination of income security, inflation protection, and essential service provision makes it an increasingly important consideration for sophisticated investors seeking to preserve and grow their wealth in challenging market conditions. For investors seeking transparent, direct access to healthcare property investments, Single Asset Funds offered by specialists such as SIRE Capital Partners provide an alternative to the leveraged buyout approach favoured by private equity, potentially offering more sustainable returns with greater investor control and transparency.

Our Opinion

We see the increasing institutional focus on UK healthcare property as a clear validation of the sector’s fundamental strength and defensive characteristics. While this trend highlights the asset class’s appeal, it also underscores the critical need for sophisticated investors to choose structures that prioritise long-term security and transparency over aggressive, short-term strategies. We believe that investment models relying heavily on leverage, as often favoured by private equity, introduce undue risk that fundamentally undermines the stable, income-generating potential that makes healthcare property so attractive to high-net-worth individuals seeking wealth preservation.

Our perspective is firmly rooted in providing direct, transparent access to high-quality healthcare assets. We advocate for structures that eliminate blind pool risk, offering investors clear visibility and control over their capital deployed into essential services with long-term leases. This approach, focused on stable income streams and capital preservation, naturally positions us as a trusted partner for investors navigating a more competitive environment. We understand the importance of regional diversification and tax efficiency in optimising returns, and we are committed to identifying opportunities that align with our core principle of delivering secure, inflation-linked income from this resilient asset class.

Patrick Ryan is a Principal and Co-founder at SIRE Capital Partners, working on Deal Origination and Asset Management. Patrick has spent 20 years in the property sector in London. His first foray into the sector was in 2003 when he co-founded a mezzanine finance business that focused on lending to property developers in and around London. Following this he headed up SIRE Properties, a healthcare focused asset management firm. Patrick has now co-founded SIRE Capital Partners that has expanded on his healthcare asset management focus to take in broader services to include brokerage and capital advisory.

Sign up for our Newsletter

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at anytime.

    MORE ARTICLES

    Healthcare professionals discussing medical topics in a hospital corridor while wearing masks to ensure safety.

    Healthcare Property Syndication: Your Shield Against AIF Surge

    Healthcare property syndication offers transparency, inflation protection, and reliable income, addressing high-net-worth investors’ concerns about market volatility and traditional AIF limitations. NHS-backed leases provide a secure, inflation-linked investment.

    Male medical professional reviewing paperwork by large windows in a modern healthcare facility, natural light indoors.

    UK Healthcare Property: Stable Income Amid MOB Boom

    UK healthcare properties offer stable, inflation-protected income. With high occupancy rates and tenant quality, they provide secure returns amid economic uncertainty. Explore strategic investment opportunities in this resilient sector.

    HIGH NET WORTH INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR STATEMENT

    If you meet condition A or B below, you may choose to be classified as a high net worth individual for the purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Promotion of Collective Investment Schemes) (Exemptions) Order 2001.

    In the last financial year, did you have:
    If yes, please specify your income (as defined above) to the nearest £10,000 in the last financial year

    AND/OR
    If yes, please specify your net assets (as defined above) to the nearest £250,000 in the last financial year
    I declare that I have answered yes to A and/or B and wish to be treated as a high net worth individual.
    I understand that this means:
    1. I can receive financial promotions where the content may not comply with rules made by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA);
    2. I can expect no protection from the FCA, the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme

    SELF-CERTIFIED SOPHISTICATED INVESTOR STATEMENT

    If you meet condition A, B, C or D below, you may choose to be classified as a self-certified sophisticated investor for the purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Promotion of Collective Investment Schemes) (Exemptions) Order 2001.

    Have you:
    I declare that I have answered yes to A and/or B and/or C and/or D and wish to be treated as a self-certified sophisticated investor.
    understand that this means:
    1. a) I can receive financial promotions where the content may not comply with rules made by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA);
    2. b) I can expect no protection from the FCA, the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

    I am aware that it is open to me to seek advice from someone who specialises in advising on investments.